— hot take5 min

boosting posts burns money.

the boost button is the most expensive way to feel like you're advertising. it's mostly money burned.

— tl;dr

boosting optimises for cheap engagement, not business results, and gives you almost no control. ads manager targets, tests and optimises for what actually matters.

the boost button is right there, it's easy, and it makes a satisfying number go up. it's also where countless brands quietly waste their ad budget. boosting and real advertising are not the same thing, and the gap between them is your money.

— 01boosting optimises for the wrong thing

when you boost, the platform optimises for cheap engagement — likes and comments — because that's what makes the boost look successful. it's not optimising for leads, sales or anything that pays you. you get a busy-looking post and little else.

the boost button optimises for engagement, so the platform finds people who react to things. nobody in that audience was necessarily going to buy.

the result looks encouraging — reach up, cost per engagement low — while the enquiry count does not move. that gap is why businesses boost for years.

and it compounds badly. an audience trained on engagement makes every future post cheaper to reach and less likely to convert.

— 02no real control

boosting gives you crude targeting, no proper testing, and no real optimisation. ads manager gives you precise audiences, A/B testing, conversion objectives and control over where your money goes. same platform, completely different machine.

there is no conversion objective, no exclusion list, no proper audience construction and no creative test. those four are most of what makes paid work.

you also cannot choose the destination per campaign, which makes attribution impossible after the fact.

and you cannot separate the creative from the spend. a boosted post that performed tells you nothing about which part did the work.

— 03where the money should go

run real campaigns through ads manager with clear objectives, tested creative and proper targeting. you'll spend the same money and actually get something for it. the boost button is convenient; convenience is the only thing it's good at.

that setup takes an afternoon once, and every campaign afterwards is comparable — which is the difference between spending and learning.

and if the budget is genuinely small, put it behind reaching your own followers with an announcement. that is distribution, and it is the one honest use of a boost.

— 04the exception worth naming

a post that is already performing organically, boosted to your existing audience, to make an announcement land. that is visibility for people who know you.

budget it as visibility rather than acquisition, and judge it on whether the message landed rather than on what it produced.

— the short version
boosting optimises for cheap engagement and gives you no control. run real campaigns in ads manager instead. we run paid that performs →
frequently asked.
when is the boost button acceptable?
occasionally, for simple awareness of a specific post. but for any real goal — leads, sales, conversions — ads manager gives far better targeting, testing and return.
what's the difference between boosting and ads manager?
boosting optimises for cheap engagement with crude controls. ads manager offers precise targeting, A/B testing, conversion objectives and real optimisation of your spend.
where should my ad budget go?
into structured campaigns in ads manager with clear objectives, tested creative and proper targeting — the same money, far more accountable results.
paidadsopinion
G
— written by
Gaurav
Paid & Performance · Social Mafia

runs paid. obsesses over creative testing, roas, and the numbers hiding behind the reach.

let's make social work for you.